This brief information about chatbots is taken from the blog post, An Opinionated Guide to Which AI to Use: ChatGPT Anniversary Edition, by Ethan Mollick, (Dec. 7, 2023; Updated March 8, 2024). Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, is currently researching the impact of AI on work and education. He blogs at One Useful Thing, writing about his research and its practical implications. Mollick reviews a variety of chatbots by their functionality and use, including:
ChatGPT-3.5 from Open AI
This is the large language model most students probably use. It is a free, more rudimentary, version of Open AI's chatbot. According to Mollick, many of the other common models, like Google's Bard, Elon Musk's Grok, and other open-source AI, are around the GPT-3.5 level.
GPT-4 is the far superior model, that can browse the internet, cite sources, create code and images, and give you "a sense of the future of AIs, (para. 5)." Open AI's ChatGPT Plus, which runs GPT-4, has only been available by subscription.
See, How educators can get started with ChatGPT, which offers ideas for Chat prompts to demonstrate what chatbots can do.
Microsoft COPILOT
Bing Chat contains most of the functionality of GPT-4 and is currently free with a Microsoft account. It allows the user to choose one of three "conversation styles": more creative, more balanced, or more precise. Mollick advises that only the creative and precise styles use GPT-4.
This AI references more than 5,700 documents of the Catholic Church that fall within the Extraordinary and Ordinary Magisterium. The new Scholarly Mode offers free access to over 2,300 scholarly documents. Seminal works from Doctors and Fathers of the Church such as St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, St. John Chrysostom, St. Teresa of Avila, and many more are included in this mode as well as the Bible and important biblical commentaries.
Question: Act as a Roman Catholic seminary professor. Describe to seminary students why AI should not be used in seminary assignments.
Answer: As a professor in a Roman Catholic seminary, I would like to share some thoughts on why AI might not be the best tool for seminary assignments.
1. **Understanding of Faith**: AI, as it stands today, lacks the ability to understand faith and spirituality on a personal level. These are deeply human experiences that are often beyond the scope of algorithms and data analysis.
2. **Interpretation of Religious Texts**: While AI can analyze text and identify patterns, it lacks the ability to understand context, especially when it comes to religious texts. The interpretation of these texts often requires a deep and nuanced understanding that AI currently cannot provide.
3. **Ethical Considerations**: There are also ethical considerations to take into account. Using AI could potentially lead to a mechanization of faith and spirituality, which are inherently human and personal experiences.
4. **Personal Reflection**: Seminary assignments often require personal reflection and introspection. AI, being devoid of personal experiences and emotions, is not equipped to aid in such tasks.
5. **Community Interaction**: Seminary education isn't just about studying; it's also about community interaction, pastoral care, and developing interpersonal skills. These are areas where AI has limitations.
Transcript of output to question by Dyan Barbeau, 1-4-2024
Question: Why should a Roman Catholic seminary student not use Chat GPT?
Answer: Roman Catholic seminary students may have specific reasons to exercise caution when considering the use of chatbots like GPT-3. While the considerations mentioned earlier generally apply, there are some additional points to keep in mind for Roman Catholic seminary students:
That said, it's essential to note that the use of technology, including AI, in theological discussions is not inherently prohibited by the Catholic Church. However, seminary students should use these tools with discernment and in conjunction with the guidance of their professors, mentors, and the teachings of the Church to ensure that their use aligns with their educational and spiritual goals while respecting the integrity of their faith tradition.
Transcript of output to question by Dyan Barbeau, 11-30-2023
Question: Act as a professor at a Roman Catholic Seminary. What would you tell seminarians about AI use for class assignments?
Response: As a professor at a Roman Catholic Seminary, I would advise seminarians to approach the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for class assignments with caution and ethical discernment. While AI can be a valuable tool for research and learning, it is important to remember that the centrality of the human person should never be replaced by algorithms or machines(1). The inherent dignity of each human being and the fraternity that binds us together as members of the one human family must undergird the development and use of new technologies (1)
When utilizing AI for class assignments, seminarians should consider the following:
In conclusion, seminarians should approach the use of AI for class assignments with a deep sense of ethical responsibility, keeping in mind the dignity of each human person and the promotion of the common good. By engaging in algor-ethics and fostering dialogue, they can contribute to a more just and inclusive use of AI in their academic pursuits.
References:
1. To members of the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See (8 January 2024)
2. To Participants in the "Rome call" meeting promoted by the Renaissance Foundation
3. Address of His Holiness Pope Francis - Minerva Dialogues
Transcript of output to question by Dyan Barbeau, 1-16-2024