Skip to Main Content

Faculty Writing & Publishing

Getting Started

Goals to Set for Yourself

  • Develop a strategy
  • Know what matters
  • Have a timetable
  • Topic
  • Calendar
  • Where do you want to be ten years from now & what do you need to do to get there?
  • Don't waste time

Know what you are writing:

  • Monograph: in-depth scholarship
  • Scholarly book: wider audience
  • Academic trade book: cornel west, Karen Armstrong, Bart Ehrman, Elaine Pagels
  • Magazine/denominational articles

General Rules for Writing

Construct your language so that it conveys your assertive authorial voice

Avoid:

  • Passive verbs
  • Lack of actions, over-reliance on "be"
  • Nominalization of verbs

Write a compelling proposal

Your idea is only part of what they're looking for; they're looking at whether you can write and communicate well—the value of good writing, even in the proposal, cannot be overstated. Show that you can write for a particular audience—in this case, the publisher.

Pieces of a good proposal:

  • Query letter
  • Prospectus
  • Brief description or abstract
  • Description of the market—be realistic and don’t overstate it (this shows that you understand the field)
  • Annotated (50-75 words) outline (note: don’t use flowery titles or subtitles)
  • Description of how the work relates to other volumes, presses, etc.
  • Status of manuscript and components:
  • Length in terms of words not pages
  • Timeline for finishing that is realistic
  • Style in which notes are done
  • Illustrations rights

Publishers

Publishers have shifted from supporting research to trying to make money, make the news, and support tenure. These three goals are ultimately incompatible, making the publishing market even more competitive than it already was.

Identify your options

See the Association of American University Presses (www.aaupnet.org) for a full list. Some of the best are:

  • University of Chicago
  • Duke University
  • Fortress
  • Abingdon
  • Westminster John Knox
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Blackwell
  • Eisenbrauns
  • BakerAcademic
  • Peter Lang (vanity, but not bad vanity)

Choose a publisher

  • Who will help you accomplish your goals
  • Where the fit is mutual

Research the publishers:

  • Learn their "language"
  • Know their "political" and theological positions/leanings
  • Know how much their books cost
  • Know to whom they market

Also:

  • Look at your own citations
  • Look at your shelves
  • Ask peers
  • Use professional organizations like CTSA & CTS
  • Network—this builds a relationship (and thus trust) between you and the publisher

Publishers are vain, and this shows that you've taken the time to get to know them. It falls on you to make the argument that your book is worth their time and effort.

General Rules for Interacting with Publishers

Do’s

  • Write on interesting, broader topics (world-cultural material is a plus!)
  • Articulate the implications of your research
  • Make sure your manuscript is well-written and clean
  • Be engaged, knowledgeable, and involved in your field
  • Be a professional who meets deadlines—this is vital!

Don’ts

  • Screw up their formatting rules, etc.
  • Forget to follow up in 4-6 weeks
  • Make surprise phone calls or visits
  • Bring full mss to conferences—even on a flash drive (it will end up in the trash)

Approach the publisher intelligently

  • Before you approach, focus your options ahead of time to a narrow list
  • Keep in mind: they are looking for reasons to say no, so don’t give them any!!!!!
  • Know your audience:
  • Avoid jargon and phrase things for a non-specialist
  • Make the argument that there is a good fit between you and this particular publisher

Develop an “elevator pitch”:

  • What you're doing
  • Why it matters
  • Why you're the scholar who can accomplish that
  • Develop and practice it ahead of time

When to approach:

  • When you have an idea; you know what you want to do
  • When you have a partially written manuscript
  • If you have an annotated table of contents

How to approach:

  • Email works for initial inquiries; a more formal letter is better (shows you can write)
  • Make sure you send them to the right editor
  • If you can send it electronically or print, send it electronically (it's easier for them)
  • Don't submit a draft; write it as well as you possibly can
  • If the encounter is in person, be attentive to body language, volume, expression, etc., and don’t “data dump”—engage in conversation

Submitting to multiple publishers is fine, but

  • Tell the publisher you've done that
  • Once one says they want to see the manuscript, stick with one, and rescind the others

Once it is submitted:

  • You have to maintain communication lines
  • If they give you concrete suggestions for revision, they are not just stringing you along